A step-by-step guide to running strategic planning workshops that actually drive action — using the Falcon Alpha Labs 7-Question Framework, built for clarity, adaptability, and decision-making under pressure.
Most strategic planning workshops end in confusion, not direction. Despite good ideas and skilled teams, the outputs are often:
• Vague or unprioritised goals
• Unclear ownership of risks or tasks
• A long list of actions — but no coherent plan
The cause is rarely a lack of insight — it’s a lack of structure.
At Falcon Alpha Labs, we help teams plan better by applying a seven-question model we’ve used in operational environments, now adapted for mission-driven businesses, NGOs, and startups.
⸻
This framework isn’t theoretical. It’s a sequence we’ve used to create clarity under pressure. The model walks a team logically from context to action.
⸻
Build a shared understanding of the external and internal environment.
Start here. Misunderstanding the context leads to misaligned goals. Use this phase to surface facts, insights, constraints, and urgency.
⸻
Define your mission and intent clearly.
This isn’t about KPIs or tasks yet. It’s about what success looks like. A good mission includes purpose, direction, and a sense of what matters most.
⸻
Clarify the desired effects and success indicators.
List the changes you want to create. These effects are the bridge between mission and action. They can be tangible or intangible — but they must be observable.
⸻
Capture assumptions and identify threats.
This is where most civilian planning fails. Good teams assume alignment. Great teams stress-test their assumptions and expose risk early — so they’re ready for it.
⸻
Explore and compare viable ways to achieve your intent.
This is the decision-making engine of the workshop. List multiple approaches. Assess feasibility, resources, and risk. Then decide — consciously.
⸻
Translate the chosen approach into a logical sequence of actions.
This isn’t a to-do list. It’s a coordinated plan. What needs to happen, in what order, and who owns each part? Where are the decision points and dependencies?
⸻
Review. Pressure-test. Then adapt as needed.
Before execution, step back. Does the plan match your intent? Have risks been accounted for? Is it briefable — and adaptable?
⸻
Get the Falcon Alpha Labs Pro Toolkit
⸻
• Time required: 2–3 focused hours
• Format: Solo planning, small team sessions, or facilitated workshops
• Tools: The Falcon Alpha Toolkit (Notion + printable PDF)
• Roles: One facilitator, all voices active
Run through the 7 questions sequentially. Assign someone to take notes, track risks, and log decisions. Don’t skip steps — each one builds on the last.
⸻
• Teams align faster
• Risks are surfaced, not buried
• Outcomes are tied to actions
• You walk out with a defensible, adaptable plan — not a vague sense of momentum
This structure has been tested in operations where failure wasn’t an option.
Now it’s helping teams across sectors make better decisions under pressure.
⸻
• Buy the Toolkit – solo or team license
• Read more planning strategy insights
• Or visit the Briefing Room for new releases